Epping Forest District Council yesterday published this apology for delays to the waste collection service as a result of bad weather.
Because of the combined effect of the revised Christmas collection calendar and the bad weather some people will go a month between recycling collections – which will not surprise anyone who has walked around local streets and seen the sacks piled high.
At Monday evening’s Cabinet meeting we were told that the other collections (food waste and residual waste) should now be more or less up to date. Unfortunately it looks likely that today’s snowfall could well cause further problems.
Of course the council’s priority at the moment must be to keep the refuse collection service running and collect as much of the missed rubbish as possible. Once this has happened we have been promised that a review will take place and any necessary lessons will be learnt.
Questions to answer include:
- What contingency plans existed?
- What is the division of responsibility between Epping Forest district council and its contractors, SITA?
- Was it possible to bring in any additional resources (equipment and/or people) especially when existing equipment failed?
- Why wasn’t it possible to provide up to date information on the website or telephone enquiry line between Christmas and the New Year?
No doubt there are plenty of others so feel free to suggest them to me. I’ve asked council officers to put this issue on the agenda of the next Scrutiny Committee so that councillors can take up residents’ concerns and contribute to the review.
One thing I noticed what the lack of gritting pavements especially in shopping areas, around schools and transport hubs. Could you ask a question about this?
Thanks for the comment. The council today (Thursday 7 Jan) suspended waste collections completely following some accidents. It has used staff who would otherwise be involved with waste collection to grit “town centres and secondary shopping areas in support of the County Council”. I think the district council is also covering sheltered housing and its own property but I haven’t seen any mention of schools or transport hubs. I’ll raise this.